Regional Strength - Another Angle
Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 12:09 am
There has been a tad of dialogue surrounding the strength of certain regions.
No matter how I look at the regions, it keeps coming up as AAA region 4 and AA/A region 1 as the baddest of the bad.
Here is the latest key performance indicator: "Number of times the #1 seed did not win the regional championship".
AA/A
Region 3: Two #1 seeds did not win. 2/14 = 14.29%
Region 2 and 4: Three #1 seeds. 3/14 = 21.43%
Region 1: SIX #1 seeds were defeated. 6/14 = 42.86%. Twice the amount of regions 2 and 4.
AAA
Region 1: Two #1 seeds were defeated. 2/14 = 14.29%
Region 2 and 3: Three #1 seeds were defeated. 3/14 = 21.43%
Region 4: SIX #1 seeds were defeated. 6/14 = 42.86%. Twice the amount of regions 2 and 3.
No matter how I look at the regions, it keeps coming up as AAA region 4 and AA/A region 1 as the baddest of the bad.
Here is the latest key performance indicator: "Number of times the #1 seed did not win the regional championship".
AA/A
Region 3: Two #1 seeds did not win. 2/14 = 14.29%
Region 2 and 4: Three #1 seeds. 3/14 = 21.43%
Region 1: SIX #1 seeds were defeated. 6/14 = 42.86%. Twice the amount of regions 2 and 4.
AAA
Region 1: Two #1 seeds were defeated. 2/14 = 14.29%
Region 2 and 3: Three #1 seeds were defeated. 3/14 = 21.43%
Region 4: SIX #1 seeds were defeated. 6/14 = 42.86%. Twice the amount of regions 2 and 3.